This post is also available in: Japanese

Thanks to on-going increases in processor performance, the number of Virtual Machines per server blade is expected to grow rapidly, from typically 20 today to a hundred in 2016. Given this growth, the virtual switch that is present on each server blade will need to distribute significantly increasing volumes of network traffic, becoming a strategic focus for networking equipment suppliers and service providers.

One of the leading applications for network virtualization is the ability to provide network overlays (or tunneling) within the server, distributing applications to multiple users as part of enabling multi-tenant installations. When implemented in an edge node such as a server, well-implemented network overlays allow the establishment of an unlimited number of virtual networks, bypassing the 4K limitation of VLANs.

One of the proposed standards for network overlays relies on the RFC-based GRE (Generic Routing Encapsulation) implementation (RFC 2784). It uses some of the optional GRE field headers to build multi-tenant-aware tools for traffic analysis, traffic inspection, and monitoring with a 24-bit identifier, allowing up to 16 million virtual subnets in the same management domain, in contrast to the limitation of VLANs.

One of the major issues for networking OEMs is the challenge of handling millions of tunnels at high performance, because of the limitations of standard, un-optimized OS networking stacks. Various initiatives are underway to offload traffic shaping functions such as ACL and QoS to optimized Network Interface Cards (NICs). Hardware upgrades, however, are always slower to implement than software changes and availability schedules for the latest NICs are somewhat unpredictable. In addition, server blades and other hardware are typically standardized throughout a data center, to facilitate management, and selective hardware (NIC) upgrades add significant complexity to the overall management environment.

If you had the option to achieve performance increases along with additional traffic engineering functions within the virtual switch, would you accept an implementation in which processor cores were dedicated to this function, in order to benefit from a hardware-independent solution to the above network overlay challenges?

Guest Blogger Disclaimer:

The views, opinions and positions expressed within these guest posts are those of the author alone and do not represent those of SDNCentral.com and SDNCentral, LLC. The accuracy, completeness and validity of any statements made within this article are not guaranteed. We accept no liability for any errors, omissions or representations. The copyright of this content belongs to the author and any liability with regards to infringement of intellectual property rights remains with them.

Checkout more from our Guest Bloggers:

• SDN And The Forgotten Data Plane – Is My Flow Equal To Your Flow? (5/11/2013)
• OpenDaylight Project: The Speed Promise By Kelly Herrell (5/10/2013)
• SDN: Software Defined Everything: Infrastructure Integration Will Never Be The Same (5/6/2013)
• A Taxonomy For SDN Solutions (5/4/2013)
• SDN: Are You Sure You Want Applications To Program The Network? (5/1/2013)